![]() |
most recent list previous next link of the day |
Copy protection, content usage rights, fair use, p2p downloading and other things that are debated now indicate that there is a big problem with the current system.
For example when CDs first appeared it was very expensive to make them, they offered a superior quality and it was very difficult to copy then without loosing that quality. That would justify high prices then, but now it is a very different picture. Manufacturing CDs costs next to nothing, duplicating it (songs) at home is very easy.
So they (content owners) claim that the high cost mostly represent the cost of actual content and not the cost of the media. But if that is the case why do I have to pay for the content many times? And I (and all the people who buy music and movies) do pay for it many times now, when I watch a movie in Movie Theater, when I buy it on VHS, on DVD etc. Also if I want to buy it on high definition DVD I will have to pay a big premium. I think it is way unfair and those big lobbying studios just using their muscles to rip off consumers by creating unfair draconian laws. So it is not a surprise that people do not like it, and they fight it they way they can, but "stealing" it. But in many many cases it is not really a theft, it is a fair use, but current skewed regulations make it illegal.
![]() |
![]() © D i m k a 2007.05.21 ¶ Ð »« Home dimka.com/search privacy policy ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |